In the chick wit column of the
Philadelphia Inquirer, Francesca Serritella writes an amusing article about her
life with her pets. In order to keep her audience interested, Serritella uses
humor and figurative language throughout the article. The use of these
rhetorical devices affects the tone of the piece and provides an interesting
perspective on life with a cat and a dog.
The simple fact that this article
was a piece based on personal experiences with two pets that do not get along
would make most readers roll their eyes or yawn out of boredom, but Serritella
from the very first sentence uses humor to captivate her audience. “My kids are
fighting. They’re not my kids. I should stop personifying them. My cat is being
mean to my son. Sorry, my cat is being aggressive with my dog.” The witty start
to a dreary topic captivates the reader and changes their attitude towards the
subject for the rest of the article. However, not only does this use of humor
charm the reader, but it also changes the tone of the piece. Some of us have
heard the advice to start a meeting with a joke, because it lightens the mood
and makes the act a little less strenuous. Well Serritella does the same thing
here, she lightens the mood and makes reading her article enjoyable. In addition
to humor, Serritella also uses figurative language throughout the piece.
Personification is a prominent rhetorical device, and although normally it is
defined as giving human qualities to an inanimate
object, the specific attributes Serritella gives to her pets I believe qualify
as personification. She refers to her cat having a mid-life crisis, or
“menopaws,” due to the uncharacteristically moody behavior she is having. Also,
Serritella uses an extended metaphor in her piece when describing how she is using
little dime bags of katnip as “cosmic cat grass” to help her unwind. Her use of
figurative language coexists with the humorous tone throughout the piece, which
is specifically shown when Serritella compares her cat’s tolerance to “drugs”
as that of Seth Rogen. This combination of rhetorical strategies provides an
interesting point of view to the topic, because we don’t usually relate dogs
and cats fighting to drug problems and menopaws. The point of view she provides
reminds her audience of similar situations they could be having with non-pets,
and by doing so makes a formerly dull topic, extremely interesting.
Overall I believe Serritella
achieved her purpose of providing an interesting view on a topic that can be
colorless. Through her use of humor and figurative language she expresses her
personal experiences that, as a columnist, is her job. In “Stuck in a Catfight –
One With a Dog,” Serritella writes an exuberant piece that makes her audience
want to read more.
No comments:
Post a Comment