In his essay, The Foul Reign of “Self-Reliance”, Benjamin Anastas, teacher and
author of several novels, depicts and argues against the original perception of
Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Self Reliance.” Through the use of anecdotes and antagonistic
tone Anastas tries but fails to reveal that the original idea of self-reliance
from Emerson’s work has turned into self-centeredness.
Anastas begins his essay with an
anecdote explaining his first exposure to Emerson’s “Self Reliance.” Sharing
that he was introduced to this piece of literature in an English class when he
was a teenager. By using this anecdote, Anastas revealed that he formerly
blamed his teacher for introducing his class to a lecture of “self-conceit so intensely intellectual”
(Anastas 2), but then realized that his teacher only “fell under the spell,
like countless others before him and after, of the most pernicious piece of
literature in the American canon” (Anastas 2). By using this anecdote, Anastas
is able to clearly state his opinion on this specific piece of literature and
describe why he has it. He believes that Emerson’s “Self-Reliance” laid havoc
to generations of Americans by praising self-centeredness. However, this is
where I believe Anastas discredits himself. By placing sole responsibility on
Emerson’s work he leaves room for other interpretations of “Self-Reliance” as
well as other reasons for why self-reliance has turned into self-centeredness
in our society.
Throughout the text, Anastas uses
an antagonistic tone to try and explain his contempt of “Emerson’s tacit
endorsement of a radically self-centered worldview” (Anastas 4). Anastas
writes, “It’s not like… the sun, the moon, and the stars revolve around our
portable reclining chairs, and whatever contradicts our right to harbor
misconceptions… is the prattle of the unenlightened majority and can be
dismissed out of hand” (Anastas 4). By using such a tone the author tries to
evoke his true feelings of American society today by depicting us as always
wanting the spotlight. Although this tone is memorable, it is ineffective. It
angers the audience for generalizing the American people as one thing when not
everyone is the same. Part of why this does not work is because Anastas does
not appeal to ethos enough to give him the authority to make such
generalizations. It also causes Anastas’s points to seem unorganized, in that
it seems his irritation takes over and his thoughts become unclear.
Although this piece of writing is
very memorable and interesting I do not feel like Anastas successfully achieves
his purpose. Due to his use of anecdotes and antagonistic tone he is unable to
show the Ralph Waldo Emerson’s “Self-Reliance” is the reason for our society’s
self-centeredness, in his work The Foul
Reign of “Self-Reliance”.
No comments:
Post a Comment