A
beauty, written by Robert Boyers, a professor and author of multiple books,
is an essay that examines beauty as a factor in one’s morality. Boyers wants to
show his readers how the beauty of the people around them can effect their own
moral compass, causing them to betray what is good because they are blinded by
the bright and radiant light of beauty. In order to investigate this abstract
idea, Boyers concentrates on how beauty may have poisoned his own morality
through an anecdotal narration, but also further explained through the use of
allusions.
“The most beautiful man I ever knew
was Charles Newman” (Boyers 52). Boyers tells this story by examining his life
with one of his friends Charles Newman. Boyers writes, “In his fifties, when he
was married to an obviously devoted and substantial woman, he was going around
with a very attractive younger woman in St. Louis” (56). Boyers knew what his
friend was doing was wrong but he did not know if he himself had a moral
obligation to tell Charlie’s wife. He thinks of how he would feel if Charlie
was flirtatious with his own wife, and he realizes that his view of Charlie’s
beauty would have been severely compromised, because he could not understand
how Charlie could cause so much pain for him and his wife. But Boyers does not
tell Charlie’s wife. He knows it is wrong but he mentions how the beauty of
Charlie allowed him to do horrible things. Not because it gave him options
(with women), but because it almost seemed like a birthright, or natural.
Boyers uses this as somewhat an excuse of his actions or more non-actions.
Further explaining through the words of Doris Lessig, Boyers alludes to Lessig
as she writes about how she feels knowing she stole a man from another woman,
and she writes, “I felt it was my right.” This use of allusion helps the author
explain how our judgment can be clouded by a deceived notion that beauty gives
people leniency when it comes to right and wrong, and the use of anecdote helps
the author show that most of us are guilty of believing it.
Although he presents an interesting
concept, I do not feel like Robert Boyers achieves his purpose. His use of
anecdote and allusions help his argument, but do not diminish counterarguments
that can be suggested as well.